Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Barr

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 9, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01569Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIRSTIN JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01569-SK (JD) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTION TO 9 v. DISQUALIFY 10 KIERSTIE BARR, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 26 Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Kirstin Johnson, on behalf of herself and as guardian ad litem for her minor 14 children, has sued the City and County of San Francisco and others for civil rights claims arising 15 out of an incident involving San Francisco Police Department officers in January 2019.1 Dkt. No. 16 1-1. Johnson’s husband is also a plaintiff. Id. ¶ 12. The case was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Robidoux v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Jeffrey L. Clemens v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API