Legal Opinion
Jeffrey L. Clemens v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in Interest
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 2005No. 05-75631PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Per curiam
Jeffrey Clemens seeks a writ of mandamus from the district court’s denial of his motion to disqualify all of the district court judges in the Central District of California from presiding over his criminal trial. We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
I
Clemens is charged in a four-count indictment with making threats with intent to extort, assault, murder, or to inflict harm upon three federal district court judges from the Central District of California, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 876 and 115(a)(1)(B). The threats were made in connection with pro se suits Clemens had filed in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Sivak v. HardisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. WR GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.