Legal Opinion
United States v. Hutt
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 19, 2021No. 4:21-cv-01292Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01292-HSG (JD) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE JUDICIAL 9 v. DISQUALIFICATION 10 NANCY HUTT, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Pro se plaintiff Shu filed a request to disqualify Judge Gilliam under
28 U.S.C. § 455
from 14 presiding over this case and another action, Case No. 20-cv-06537-HSG. Dkt. No. 16. The Court 15 has written extensively about the standards of Section 455 and allied provisions. See Nat’l 16 Abortion Fed’n v. Ctr. for Med. Progress,
257 F. Supp. 3d 1084
(N.D. Cal. 2017); Sanai v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Jeffrey L. Clemens v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.