Legal Opinion

Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 1, 1983PublishedCited by 636 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

This post-trial appeal was reheard en banc from a decision of the Court of Chan- eery. 1 It was brought by the class action plaintiff below, a former shareholder of UOP, Inc., who challenged the elimination of UOP’s minority shareholders by a cash-out merger between UOP and its majority owner, The Signal Companies, Inc. 2 Originally, the defendants in this action were Signal, UOP, certain officers and directors of those companies, and UOP’s investment banker, Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb, Inc. 3 The present Chancellor held that the terms of the merger were fair to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by636 opinions

  1. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  4. Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

631 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API