Legal Opinion

In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 8, 2006No. 411, 2005PublishedCited by 314 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

906 A.2d 27 (2006)

In re the WALT DISNEY COMPANY DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.

William Brehm and Geraldine Brehm, as Trustees and Custodians; Michael Grening; Richard Kaplan and David Kaplan, as Trustees; Thomas M. Malloy; Richard J. Kager and Carol R. Kager, as Joint Tenants; Michael Caesar, as Trustee for Howard Gunty, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan; Robert S. Goldberg, I.R.A.; Michael Shore; Michele DeBendictis; Peter Lawrence, I.R.A.; Melvin Zupnick; Judith B. Wohl, I.R.A. James C. Hays; and Barnett Stepak, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants,

v.

Michael D. Eisner, Michael S. Ovitz, Stephen F. Bollenbach,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by314 opinions

  1. Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  3. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. GheewallaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Desimone v. BarrowsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007

309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API