Legal Opinion

Davis v. Weiskopf

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 1982No. 81-944PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

Plaintiff, Parry J. Davis, appealed from the dismissal of his amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action for medical malpractice against defendant, Dr. Norman A. Hagman. The trial court determined as a matter of law there was no physician-patient relationship between plaintiff and defendant and, therefore, no cause of action for malpractice could arise.

Count V of plaintiff’s amended complaint alleged inter alia that on May 8, 1979, Dr. Jerome S. Weiskopf examined plaintiff in the emergency room of Rockford Memorial Hospital and Dr. Philip D. Brooks took X rays of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mieher v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Goldstein v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Bank of Northern Illinois v. NugentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Yardley v. YardleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API