Legal Opinion

In Re Chicago Flood Litigation

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1997No. 80460, 80535 consPublishedCited by 479 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

In April 1992, the underground freight tunnel system in the central business district of Chicago flooded. Numerous named plaintiffs (class plaintiffs) represent individuals and businesses that claim property damage and economic loss as a result. ITT Hartford (Hartford), the subrogee of several additional claimants, opted out of the certified class. Class plaintiffs and Hartford each brought an action in the circuit court of Cook County against defendants, the City of Chicago (City) and the Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company (Great Lakes). Class plaintiffs and Hartford sought damages for…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by479 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998

474 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API