Legal Opinion

Pelham v. Griesheimer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1982No. 54851PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ryan

Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action for legal malpractice against the defendant, Ronald Griesheimer. The circuit court of Lake County held that there was no attorney-client relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendant and that therefore no cause of action for legal malpractice was stated. The appellate court affirmed. (93 Ill. App. 3d 751.) We granted plaintiffs leave to appeal (73 Ill. 2d R. 315).

Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleges that the defendant was retained to represent Loretta Ray in a divorce action against her…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Ennenga v. StarnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Rowe v. State Bank of LombardIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tricontinental Industries, Limited and Tricontinental Distribution, Limited v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API