Legal Opinion
Beaudry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1939No. 9181PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
With unquestioned sincerity, with a persistence and indomitableness, apparently invincible, and with varying vicissitudes, the appellant Beaudry, a dealer in automobiles, has through three trials and three *988appeals,1 including this one, pursued a Ford automobile, seized by the Government for forfeiture under the Revised Statutes, Section 3450, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1156, 1441. Matching him in sincerity and persistence, and victor below on the claim for remission, the Government meets him in the lists, on this his third appeal, opposing thrust for thrust, and blow for blow.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United States, and Twenty-Three Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Morris v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Florida Dealers and Growers Bank and Amy E. Moon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Aetna Finance Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. One 1941 Cadillac Sedan, Motor & Serial No. 5367924Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- United States v. One 1946 Mercury Sedan AutomobileDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1951
- United States v. One 1951 Chevrolet Tudor AutoDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.