Legal Opinion
Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United States, and Twenty-Three Other Cases
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 21, 1923No. Nos. 341-364PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
The Circuit Court of Appeals attached importance to the conduct of Collins toward Turnan and the compromise made between him and Holbrook, to his willingness to abandon other titles secured by Holbrook when questioned, and to the long delay in recording the deeds to the Company (Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 574, 576) as suspicious circumstances indicating a consciousness on the part of the capitalists in the Company that the titles of the Company to the lands here in question were vulnerable because of the practices of Hol-brook and Turnan. Without minimizing the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- J. J. McCaskill Co v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Holden v. . New York and Erie BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. Robert L. Weaver, John C. Weaver and Sons and Weaver Farms, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- First National Bank of Cicero v. Lewco Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Jackson v. Mishkin (In Re Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Munroe v. HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.