Legal Opinion
Habitat & Watershed Caretakers v. City of Santa Cruz
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 2013No. H037545PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1283Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Appellant Habitat and Watershed Caretakers (Habitat) challenges the trial court’s denial of its mandate petition. Habitat’s petition contended that respondent City of Santa Cruz (the City) had failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.). The City had certified an environmental impact report (EIR) for a project to seek an amendment of the City’s sphere of influence (SOI) to include an undeveloped portion of the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), campus known as “North Campus” so as to permit the City to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Larson v. UHS of Rancho Springs CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Nolte v. Cedars Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Franciscans for Livable Neighborhoods v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.