Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Public Util. Com.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1971No. Docket Nos. S.F. 22794, 22793PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Mary Moran Pajalich and Timothy E. Treacy for Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

These are consolidated proceedings to review Decision No. 77984 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. The decision provides that the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (Pacific) may use accelerated depreciation with the normalization method of accounting as defined in subsection (Z)(2)(B) of section 167 of the Internal Revenue Code and that, if it elects to do so, the commission, for rate making purposes, will compute Pacific’s tax expense on the basis of straight line depreciation for the purpose of establishing its cost of service and will give…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Public Utilities Com.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dyke Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Northern California Power Agency v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API