Legal Opinion
Paine & Williams Co. v. Baldwin Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1940No. 8163PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The claims of the patents in suit, held invalid by the District Court, are Claim 3 of Turner, 1,715,523, granted June 4, 1929, on an application filed July 27, 1925, and the single claim of Vrooman, 1,715,-525, granted June 4, 1929, on an application filed May 13, 1927. 1 Appellant, as owner of the patents, which relate to floor coverings for automobiles, appeals from the decree dismissing the bill of complaint.
The issue of infringement was held by the District Court to be res judicata as between the parties because of a judgment by the District Court in a suit at law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Morris A. Hicks, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.