Legal Opinion

Triplett v. Lowell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 30, 1936No. Nos. 388, 590PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

In No. 388 certiorari was granted to resolve questions as to the scope and effect of the disclaimer statute, R. S. §§ 4917, 4922, 35 U. S. C. §§ 65, 71, raised in a suit brought to enjoin infringement of several patent claims, some of which had previously been held invalid in an infringement suit in another circuit against different defendants.

In No. 590 like questions have been argued upon .certificate to this Court, under § 239 of the Judicial Code, of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

No. 388.

Respondents in No. 388,- before bringing the present .suit, had sued in a district…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API