Legal Opinion

Morris A. Hicks, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Quaker Oats Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1981No. 80-3537PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANDALL, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a suit by fourteen former employees of the defendant Quaker Oats Company for benefits under a special retirement program, and presents several difficult questions regarding the law of collateral estoppel. Essentially, the issues revolve around the propriety of the use of offensive collateral estoppel with respect to a prior unappealed and alternative ground of decision of a trial court. Because we think that the trial judge abused his discretion by applying offensive collateral estop-pel in the circumstances of this case, we reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. TrapnellTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Louis S. St. Laurent, Ii, Debtors. Louis S. St. Laurent, II v. William J. Ambrose and Patty A. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API