Legal Opinion
Jackson v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 1980No. 79-283PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Michael Jackson and his parents appeal from an order granting summary judgment on all their claims derived from a mistaken arrest of Michael by District of Columbia police and federal agents. The Jacksons contend that (1) the trial court improperly considered a defense of collateral estoppel, since it was not affirmatively pleaded, (2) the trial court erred in holding their claims barred by collateral estoppel based on a prior judgment of the United States District Court, and (3) the trial court erred in finding that the police officers had probable cause and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Afro-American Publishing Co., Inc. v. Eli Jaffe, T/a Douglas PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Etheredge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Frances Rogala v. District of Columbia and Ephriam Williams, Officer, Badge 4357Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.