Legal Opinion

Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. T. Buck Construction, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 6, 1993PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The defendants, T. Buck Construction, Inc. (T. Buck) and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G) appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Androscoggin County, Brodrick, J.) in favor of Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. on its claim pursuant to the Public Works Surety Bond Law, 14 M.R.S.A. § 871 (1980 & Supp.1992), for damages arising from an alleged breach of an equipment supply contract. T. Buck and USF & G contend that the court erred in entering a summary judgment because there exist genuine issues of material fact regarding the identity of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Estate of Althenn v. AlthennSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. FO Bailey Co., Inc. v. Ledgewood, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Farrell v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Vance v. SpeakmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Curtis v. PorterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Darryl W. Elliott v. S.D. Warren CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Financial Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Tondreau v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Seashore Performing Arts Center, Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API