Legal Opinion

Board of Regents of the University v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1987No. 52583-8PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

The plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment order which holds that the City of Seattle owns an easement for street purposes over Fourth Avenue. The trial court order requires the plaintiffs to abide by Seattle City Ordinance 111554, tear down the Fourth Avenue skybridge, and repair any damage caused by its removal. The City cross-appeals from the trial court's refusal to enforce that portion of the ordinance which imposes street use fees assessed for 1981 to 1985 as a condition of stay.

We hold that the plaintiffs are equitably estopped to challenge the 1906-condemnation judgment which…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Griggs v. Averbeck Realty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API