Legal Opinion

Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1998No. 63940-0PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

The Snohomish County Superior Court reversed a decision and order of the Snohomish County Council requiring Petitioners to prepare a limited environmental impact statement for their land use project developments. The Court of Appeals reversed and Petitioners seek review of that decision. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Petitioners, Lawrence W and Darlene I. Whitfield (Whitfield), and their family corporation, DD&L, Inc., own 34 *291acres of property in Snohomish County. Whitfield wants to divide the property into 54 individual lots. Petitioners, Sal-din Securities, Inc. and NADW Northwest, Inc.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Pierce County Sheriff v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API