Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
The Snohomish County Superior Court reversed a decision and order of the Snohomish County Council requiring Petitioners to prepare a limited environmental impact statement for their land use project developments. The Court of Appeals reversed and Petitioners seek review of that decision. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioners, Lawrence W and Darlene I. Whitfield (Whitfield), and their family corporation, DD&L, Inc., own 34 *291acres of property in Snohomish County. Whitfield wants to divide the property into 54 individual lots. Petitioners, Sal-din Securities, Inc. and NADW Northwest, Inc.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Pierce County Sheriff v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.