Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Stoudmire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2001No. 70435-0PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

In this personal restraint petition (PRP), we are asked to determine whether a defendant may withdraw his guilty plea when the plea form failed to inform him of the duration of mandatory community placement. Jerrod Duane Stoudmire, who pleaded guilty to several counts involving child molestation, claims that he would not have pleaded guilty had he known of the mandatory two-year term of residential placement after incarceration. We hold *261that this PRP is procedurally barred under RCW 10.73.090d).1

FACTS

On July 20, 1992, the State charged Stoudmire with one count of rape of a child in the second…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of StoudmireWashington Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API