Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Stoudmire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2000No. 67711-5PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.

— In a second personal restraint petition (PRP) filed more than one year after judgment, petitioner Jerrod Stoudmire seeks relief on several grounds, including that the trial court had no authority to convict petitioner where the statute of limitation had expired and that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority in imposing certain sentences. Before this court can consider the merits of Stoudmire’s claims, we must decide whether to dismiss his petition on procedural grounds. The State asserts Stoudmire has submitted a mixed petition in violation of RCW 10.73.100 and that because the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re TurayWashington Supreme Court · 2003

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API