Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Weinke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1971No. 368PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the county court abused its discretion in granting the petition for a substitution of attorneys.
Sec. 324.29 (3), Stats., provides:
“Attorneys. No attorney shall appear, or be appointed as guardian ad litem, for different persons in the same matter or proceedings, whose interests and rights in relation to such matter or proceeding shall be conflicting. The attorney who shall first appear for any party shall be recognized as his attorney throughout the matter or proceeding, unless another is substituted with his consent in writing, or for good…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Estate of Ogg v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of ArnebergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Sieben v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Thayer v. Rock County Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Anderson v. McBurneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Succession of JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Christie v. DoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GulbankianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.