Sieben v. Phillips
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The trial court determined that the instant case is governed by Estate of Ogg (1952), 262 Wis. 181, 54 N. W. (2d) 175, while the appellant executor contends Estate of Braasch (1957), 274 Wis. 569, 80 N. W. (2d) 759, controls.
The facts of the present case parallel those in the Ogg Case in one respect and differ in others. The clauses of both wills, which expressed a desire that a named attorney be retained to probate the estate, stressed that such attorney had an intimate knowledge of testator’s affairs. However, the Ogg will named no executor, and the corporate fiduciary, which was appointed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knox v. KnoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Estate of Ogg v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Seifert v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Estate of BraaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Will of Platt v. Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. McBurneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Sutherland v. WeinkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GulbankianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Thayer v. Rock County Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Estate of DevroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.