Legal Opinion

Estate of Ogg v. First National Bank of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1952PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuerie, J.

Counsel for the respondents contend that sec. 310.25, Stats., gives Grace L. Ogg, as next of kin of the testator, the unqualified right to name the attorneys for the bank, as administrator with the will annexed, even though testator in his will directed that Mr. Biart be employed as legal counsel by the administrator with the will annexed and trustee. Sec. 310.25, provides as follows:

“Whenever a firm or corporation of any kind is named as administrator or executor of an estate, he or she who is nearest of kin and who receives any interest in the estate, and if there be no bequest of any kind,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Will of Ball v. BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Will on DardisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Schaefer v. ZiebellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pedrick v. First National Bank of RiponWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Crown Castle USA, Inc. v. Orion Construction Group, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Estate of BealeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Department of Public Welfare v. First National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API