Legal Opinion

Christie v. Dold

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 18608, 18627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSCH, Circuit Judge.

Carolyn Christie (Christie) is the adminis-tratrix with will annexed of the estate of Judson S. Berry. ■ She was appointed to that position on July 7,1992. Thereafter she filed this lawsuit against Cyril and Phyllis Miller (Millers), the former executors of the Berry estate, and against Paul J. Dold (Dold), an attorney. Dold represented Millers while they were the executors of the Berry estate. Christie’s lawsuit was to recover money embezzled by Dold. It is undisputed that Millers had no part in or knowledge of the embezzlement. The suit against Millers is based upon…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Westover v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Treib v. KernSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lukens v. ZavadilSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kaufman v. Kaufman's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Rumbolz v. WipfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Weekley v. ProstrolloSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Williams v. MaulisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Graham v. Babinski PropertiesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API