Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Simpson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1951No. L. A. 21704PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, petitioner, the Board, of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, seeks to require respondent, district attorney of that county, to institute proceedings for the abatement of a certain public nuisance as directed by petitioner.

The undisputed petition shows that petitioner has been presented with facts and has determined that a certain building situated in Los Angeles County is being used for “lewdness, assignation and prostitution.” It directed respondent to commence an action to abate the nuisance, but respondent refused to act asserting that the duty of bringing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Boyne v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People Ex Rel. Bradford v. BarbiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. MoroneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. MacYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. SidenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stafford v. Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People Ex Rel. Clancy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API