Legal Opinion
Maral v. City of Live Oak
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 2013No. C071822PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
In December 2011, the City of Live Oak (the City) passed an ordinance prohibiting the cultivation of marijuana for any purpose within the City. Plaintiffs sued, contending the ordinance violated the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (CUA) (Health & Saf. Code, 1 § 11362.5), the Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) (§ 11362.7 et seq.), equal protection, and due process. The trial court sustained the City’s demurrer and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs argue that the CUA and the MMP grant them the right to cultivate medical marijuana. As our Supreme Court recently…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kirby v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Picerne Construction Corp. v. Castellino VillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Estill v. Cnty. of Shasta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Martine v. Heavenly Valley Ltd. P'ship, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- 511 S. Park View, Inc. v. TsantisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.