Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
In this case we must reconcile provisions of the Public Utilities Code which (1) deprive the superior courts of jurisdiction to “review, reverse, correct, or annul” any order or decision of the Public Utilities Commission or to interfere with the commission’s performance of its official *4duties (Pub. Util. Code, § 1759)1 and which (2) vest the superior courts with jurisdiction to award damages against any public utility which acts unlawfully, or fails to act as required by law (§ 2106).2
In the instant case, defendant Pacific Telephone Company (Pacific) allegedly failed to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co. v. River Terminals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Cole v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Illinois Bell Switching Station LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.