Matter of Pearsall-Stipek
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
961 P.2d 343 (1998)
136 Wash.2d 255
In the Matter of the Recall of Cathy "PEARSALL-STIPEK, Pierce County Auditor, Respondent. (Two Cases)
Nos. 65755-6, 65993-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued May 26, 1998.
Decided September 3, 1998.
Mark Bennett, Bonney Lake, pro se.
Joseph F. Quint, Lakewood, for respondent.
DURHAM, Chief Justice.
In these two consolidated cases, Mark Bennett appeals the Superior Courts' dismissals of his recall petitions against the Pierce County Auditor, Cathy Pearsall-Stipek. Mr. Bennett's first recall petition makes the same charges based on the same facts as those…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Sanders; Concurrence · Alexander.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hsu Ying Li v. TangWashington Supreme Court · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In re the Recall of AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Rogerson Hiller Corp. v. Port of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.