Legal Opinion
Duvall v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 9, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 602PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KELLAM, District Judge.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, Title 28 § 1346(b), 2671, 2674, 2679, U.S.C.A., the infant plaintiff through his father and next friend instituted this action to recover from the United States damages for injuries sustained as the result of the explosion of a pyrotechnic Navy practice bomb. The parties stipulated that (a) the United States owns and exercises authority over the Naval Practice Bombing Range at Duck, North Carolina; (b) that all administrative procedures required by Title 28 § 2401(b) have been complied with; (c)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Maryland Ex Rel. Burkhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Beasley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beard v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Akiona v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
- Beard v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981