Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The Tort Claims Act provides that “the findings of fact of the Commission shall be conclusive if there is any competent evidence to support them. . . .” G.S. 143-293; Bradshaw v. Board of Education, 244 N.C. 393, 93 S.E. 2d 434.
Necessarily, then, decision turns on whether there is any competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s finding and conclusion that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent in bar of recovery.
The question thus posed requires a recurrence to these fundamental principles of law: Contributory negligence is such an act or omission on the part of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Brewster v. Elizabeth City.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Elder v. Plaza RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Lynn v. Overlook DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality VenturesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. Gastonia City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.