Legal Opinion
Beasley v. United States
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided December 23, 1948No. Civ. A. 1901, 1902PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARING, Chief Judge.
The two above entitled cases are brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 931 et seq., The first is brought on behalf of William R. Beasley, a minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, for personal injuries. The second is brought by J. O. Beasley and Martha R. Beasley, parents of the said William R. Beasley, for loss of services, expenses of medicines, medical treatment, hospitalization and other items of damage. The two cases were heard together since they arise out of the same state of facts..The cases are claims against the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Cirsosky v. SmathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Batson v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Tobias v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Ark-Tenn Distributing Corp. v. Breidt Breidt Appeal of Breidt. Appeal of Ark-Tenn Distributing CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
- Sieb's Hatcheries, Inc. v. LindleyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.