Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Duggar

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1974No. 9914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs sought to quiet their title to 17.917 acres of land lying in the Syá SEJ4 of a designated section. The westerly 8 acres lie in the SWJ4 SEi/j.. These- 8 acres are the only lands with which we are concerned on this appeal.

The district court entered a final judgment and decree quieting title to the entire 17.917 acre tract in plaintiffs. Defendant, Cleo H. Duggar, who claimed the said westerly 8 acres, has appealed. We affirm.

Plaintiffs claimed, and the district court found and concluded, that plaintiffs had acquired title to these 8 acres by adverse possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hughes v. MeemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Quintana v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Frericks v. SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romero v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Romero v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sternloff v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brylinski v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Selby v. RoggowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API