Richardson v. Duggar
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiffs sought to quiet their title to 17.917 acres of land lying in the Syá SEJ4 of a designated section. The westerly 8 acres lie in the SWJ4 SEi/j.. These- 8 acres are the only lands with which we are concerned on this appeal.
The district court entered a final judgment and decree quieting title to the entire 17.917 acre tract in plaintiffs. Defendant, Cleo H. Duggar, who claimed the said westerly 8 acres, has appealed. We affirm.
Plaintiffs claimed, and the district court found and concluded, that plaintiffs had acquired title to these 8 acres by adverse possession…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marquez v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Hughes v. MeemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Quintana v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Frericks v. SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Romero v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Romero v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Sternloff v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Brylinski v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Selby v. RoggowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999