Legal Opinion

Selby v. Roggow

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1999No. 18749PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

{1} In this legal malpractice case, Plaintiffs appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. The central issue asserted on appeal is whether the trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that none of the facts relied upon by Plaintiffs would have provided a basis to avoid a mortgage foreclosure or have supported a viable counterclaim in the foreclosure action brought against them, wherein Defendants were employed as defense counsel. We hold that the granting of summary judgment was proper.

FACTS

{2} Plaintiffs, real estate developers, filed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Fields v. City of South Houston, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Wagner Land and Investment Co. v. HaldermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Sunland Park v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bassett v. SheehanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API