Legal Opinion

Brylinski v. Cooper

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1981No. 12866PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Chief Justice.

Brylinski filed suit to quiet title to a farm of approximately 490 acres. Her title to all but eighty acres was uncontested. Jones challenged 'Brylinski’s title to the eighty acres and sought to quiet title thereto. Brylinski and Jones filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court entered judgment denying Brylinski’s motion and granting Jones’ motion for summary judgment by quieting title to the eighty acres in Jones. The trial court also ordered Jones to pay Brylinski the sum of $2,400 as refund of part of the purchase price paid by Brylinski’s mother…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Downing v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Chambers v. BessentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Baker v. BenedictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Combs v. DuBoisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Slemmons v. MassieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Williams v. HowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Decastro v. StuartDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
  5. Quarles v. ArcegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API