Legal Opinion

Romero v. Garcia

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1976No. 10116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

546 P.2d 66 (1976)

89 N.M. 7

IDA M. ROMERO, formerly Ida Garcia, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Antonio GARCIA et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 10116.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

February 12, 1976.

White, Koch, Kelly & McCarthy, S.S. Koch, Santa Fe, for appellants.

Matias L. Chacon, Espanola, for appellee.

OPINION

SOSA, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee Ida Romero, formerly Garcia, filed suit to quiet title against defendants-appellants Mr. and Mrs. Antonio Garcia, who are her former father-in-law and mother-in-law. The suit to quiet title was based upon adverse possession for more than ten years under color of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Turner v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pacheco v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Blumenthal v. Concrete Constructors Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Sternloff v. HughesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API