United States v. Huggins
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
FOREMAN, Judge:
The appellant was convicted of three specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921, and this Court affirmed the findings and sentence. United States v. Huggins, 12 M.J. 657 (ACMR 1981). The Court of Military Appeals has remanded the case for our consideration of an issue raised before them for the first time. 13 M.J. 196 (CMA 1982) (order).
The appellant now contends that the military judge erred by denying challenges for cause against three court members, Colonel Lomax, Major…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. McGowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. FortUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WitherspoonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HeriotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983