Legal Opinion

United States v. Nixon

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 19, 2004No. 03-80793PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

The government requests reconsideration of this Court’s order of 23 April 2004, which held that Defendants Terrón M. Nixon and Maurice M. Curry were ineffectively represented by counsel in the state court system when they declined a plea offer that had as an element a promise regarding potential prosecution in federal court. As part of the 23 April opinion, I ordered the government to produce documents related to Project Safe Neighborhoods for in camera examination by 7 June 2004.

The government moves for reconsideration of that order, putting forward…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Phillip Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Eddie D. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GrayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  2. United States v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. SYLLA v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  4. SYLLA v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API