Rinaldi v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
*23Per Ctjriam.
Petitioner’s participation in a plot to rob safe-deposit boxes of the Doral Beach Hotel in Miami Beach, Fla., violated the laws of both the State of Florida and the United States. He has been tried, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment by both sovereigns. He claims that his federal conviction was obtained in violation of established federal policy against multiple prosecutions for the same offense and, for that reason, should be set aside. The Solicitor General agrees and submits that the Court should summarily “vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Petite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by366 opinions
- Johnida W. Barnes v. Byron R. WinchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Rice v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
361 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.