Phillip Griffin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHN, District Judge.
This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Phillip Griffin (Griffin), proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under section 2255. Griffin was convicted of distribution of cocaine base; his conviction was affirmed on appeal. He says that his trial counsel failed to tell him of a plea offer and argues that this constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. The government argues that the record shows that Griffin would not have accepted a plea offer even if he had been told about it.
For the reasons that follow, we reverse the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jackie Humphress v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.