Legal Opinion

Phillip Griffin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2003No. 01-3818PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHN, District Judge.

This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Phillip Griffin (Griffin), proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under section 2255. Griffin was convicted of distribution of cocaine base; his conviction was affirmed on appeal. He says that his trial counsel failed to tell him of a plea offer and argues that this constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. The government argues that the record shows that Griffin would not have accepted a plea offer even if he had been told about it.

For the reasons that follow, we reverse the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lance Pough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Jackie Humphress v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API