Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 6, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 53, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

As a result of proceedings initiated by petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, pursuant to Md.Rule BV9, Judge Marshall Levin of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City concluded that respondent, Edward Thomas Maxwell, Jr., had violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1) and (4) and 7-102(A)(5). 1 We shall suspend Maxwell from the practice of law for a period of 90 days.

Neither party has excepted to any of Judge Levin’s findings of fact or conclusions of law, and after independent review of the record, we adopt them. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Babbitt, 300 Md.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Prince George's County Bar Ass'n v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API