Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. O'Neill

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 25, 1979No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 14, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Murphy, C. J., and Orth and Cole, JJ., dissent and Murphy, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Orth and Cole, JJ., concur at page 57 infra.

Bar Counsel on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a petition for disciplinary action against Robert Joseph O’Neill, III (O’Neill). It alleged that he had violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102 (A), subsections (4), (5), and (6). Pursuant to the Maryland BV rules we referred the complaint to a judge of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for hearing. He conducted an evidentiary hearing. He *53then filed a memorandum opinion setting forth his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FinneseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HauptCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API