Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. O'Neill
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Murphy, C. J., and Orth and Cole, JJ., dissent and Murphy, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Orth and Cole, JJ., concur at page 57 infra.
Bar Counsel on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a petition for disciplinary action against Robert Joseph O’Neill, III (O’Neill). It alleged that he had violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102 (A), subsections (4), (5), and (6). Pursuant to the Maryland BV rules we referred the complaint to a judge of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for hearing. He conducted an evidentiary hearing. He *53then filed a memorandum opinion setting forth his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FinneseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HauptCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
3Cited by23 opinions
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.