Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson's Administratrix

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 13, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the -Court by

Judge Dietzman

Reversing.

In 1912, Thomas C. Johnson, who owned a boundary of land along the Kentucky river in Lee county, for a valuable consideration deeded to the appellant for the purpose of straightening its track, a right of way through that boundary. As a part of the consideration for this conveyance, but in an instrument separate from the deed, appellant contracted with Johnson “to construct and maintain a combined freight and passenger station and a sidetrack on the lands described in said deed,” at a point between certain termini to be selected by Johnson, “the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Jones v. Newport News & M. V. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
  4. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cunningham, Admr. v. New York Cent. R. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Meacham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Burke v. Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Johnson's Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Louisville Interurban R. Co. v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API