Scheller v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered April 27, 1918, dismissing an action for breach, of covenant, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Respondent’s predecessor was incorporated for the purpose of building and operating an electric railroad line between Tacoma and Steilacoom. One Whyte at the time was owner of section 22, which was situated near the line of the proposed railroad. Whyte platted a portion of the southwest quarter of that section and, by written agreement with the railroad company, agreed to convey to it the E. ½ of N. E. ¼ of S. W. ¼; E. ½ of E. ½ of N. W. ¼; Blocks 7, 8, 15, 16, together with a strip of land 30 feet wide through the S. E. ¼ the section upon which the railroad had been located. The agreement…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Whalen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Gilmer v. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- White v. Mississippi Power & Light CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
- Washington Security Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Bell v. Town of MabtonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.