Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Marshall

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1890No. 293, 1105PublishedCited by 173 opinions

APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE' UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. The court stated the case as follows: These are appeals from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.

Read the full summary

APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE' UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. The court stated the case as follows: These are appeals from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas. The suit was originally brought by the city of Marshall in the court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Texas against the Texas and Pacific Railway ■ Company,' and was afterwards removed by that company' into the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.. The suit was a bill in chancery which sought relief for a violation…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Miller,

after stating the ease, delivered the ■ opinion of the court.

As regards the appeal of the railway company, two principal questions are presented. The first of these is, was there a valid contract that the corporation should not only establish its eastern terminus at Marshall City and put up there,the depot buildings and machine shops, car works, etc., included in the contract, but should keep them there perpetually? Second, if this were so, is it a contract which a court of chancery' should enforce ?

If it were not for the word “ permanent,” as found in the communication of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mead v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Poet Clinton Railroad v. Cleveland & Toledo RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Karnuth v. United States Ex Rel. AlbroSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. Washington Territory Ex Rel. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API