Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1896No. 483PublishedCited by 25 opinions

In Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Eastern District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

The' facts of this case, as gathered from tbe record, are as follows: In 1856, W. T. Scott, Sr., was the owner of a considerable tract of land on the line of the then contemplated Southern Pacific Railway Company. Scott made a verbal contract with the railway company, by which be gave to tbe company the right to use a strip 100 feet wide, over his land, for a right of way, if the company would estaTalish a depot at a point on said land now known as “Seottsville,” and would further give said Scott and his family free transportation over the road. W. T. Scott, Sr., was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Texas Western Railway Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Haas v. ChoussardTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Compton v. Waco Bridge Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Click v. Lamar CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Raymond Lumber Co. v. Raymond Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Herzog v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R.R.California Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API