Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GARTNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1996No. 95-50072PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Michael Gartner appeals interlocutor-ily the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his criminal indictment on double jeopardy grounds. “A district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss an indictment on double jeopardy grounds is reviewed de novo.” United States v. Chick, 61 F.3d 682, 686 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1416, 134 L.Ed.2d 542 (1996). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, id. at 684-86, and we affirm.
Gartner is currently under indictment for securities fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, and engaging in unlawful monetary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Jerry Wayne Tilley, and Susan Wells Tilley, Tommy Ross Anderson and Sarah Jane AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Martin D. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Andrews, Arthur R.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Gary Van WaeyenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. James Brennan, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. John JumperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.