United States v. Andrews, Arthur R.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Appellants are the chief executive officer and president of a corporation against which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a civil monetary penalty in 1995. In 1996, a grand jury indicted appellants for essentially the same conduct. Appellants contend that the SEC penalty constitutes a punishment that bars their subsequent criminal prosecution under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree. Whether or not such a penalty would implicate the Clause if imposed on appellants, we hold that the penalty imposed on the corporation…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Weathers, Marc K.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Raleigh v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph T. Siewick v. Jamieson Science and Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Tac-Critical Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Facility Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.