Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrews, Arthur R.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1998No. 97-3035, 97-3036PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARLAND, Circuit Judge:

Appellants are the chief executive officer and president of a corporation against which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a civil monetary penalty in 1995. In 1996, a grand jury indicted appellants for essentially the same conduct. Appellants contend that the SEC penalty constitutes a punishment that bars their subsequent criminal prosecution under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree. Whether or not such a penalty would implicate the Clause if imposed on appellants, we hold that the penalty imposed on the corporation…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Weathers, Marc K.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Estate of Raleigh v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Liberty Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph T. Siewick v. Jamieson Science and Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Tac-Critical Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Facility Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API