Legal Opinion

United States v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 24, 2007No. 05-3370PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

Despite the promising name — First Choice Investment Capital — First Choice should not have been the first choice for any investor. This is because it was a fraud. Set up to market earned automobile receivables (EARs) as an investment opportunity that would return 11% interest on a monthly basis, the program flourished at collecting investors’ money. It did not, however, do so well at returning it. Consequently, Gary Van Waeyenberghe, the mastermind behind First Choice and at least one other investment “opportunity,” was charged in a 54-count indictment…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. DesaiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. United States v. Michael DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API