United States v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Despite the promising name — First Choice Investment Capital — First Choice should not have been the first choice for any investor. This is because it was a fraud. Set up to market earned automobile receivables (EARs) as an investment opportunity that would return 11% interest on a monthly basis, the program flourished at collecting investors’ money. It did not, however, do so well at returning it. Consequently, Gary Van Waeyenberghe, the mastermind behind First Choice and at least one other investment “opportunity,” was charged in a 54-count indictment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HallidayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. DesaiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- United States v. Michael DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.