Legal Opinion

Burckhalter v. Vann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 5513PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Craig County . Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by James Yann against Erank 1. Burckhalter and others. Judgment for plain tiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Craig county by the defendant in error, here inafter styled the plaintiff, a Cherokee freedman. against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter styled the defendants, In lance1 certain deeds lo 60 acres of land situated in Craig county, Okla. The plaintiff alleged that he had' executed deeds to the land in controversy to Erank L. Burckhalter and to W. H. A'enters, the deed to Burckhalter being executed November. 1, 1904, and the deed to Venters being executed May 24, 1905, and that the. land had been conveyed by Burck-halter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Douglass v. NuzumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Powers v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Morton v. OrsdolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Bechler v. KayeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Buell v. U-Par-Har-HaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Culver v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API